CRISPR/Cas9-modified plants
CRISPR/Cas9-modified plants
Crispr/cas 9 is a simple and efficient method to modify organisms. NGOs like Greenpeace and Friends of the Earth criticize this application. That humanity does not know enough to understand this complex science to use GMOs safely. They argue that crispr/cas9 reduces species diversity, gene transfer between species, effects on non-target species. Another important point is the control of farmers by large corporations and the fear of increased use of harmful pesticides [1]. However, some think that the ethical question is more important than the safety of the environment and they don't think you should play "God." [1].
In Switzerland, GMOs are prohibited in agriculture. This means that they may not be planted [2]. However, shops may sell approved and labelled GMOs for food [3]. In Switzerland, soya and maize are currently the most permitted, as well as two vitamins, two rennet ferments and two processing additives for use in foodstuffs [3]. For example, the situation is different for the European Union. Some GMO foods are legal to be planted but under very strict conditions [4]. In the EU, food is only labelled if it contains more than 0.9% GMOs [5]. In Germany it would be legal but since 2012 no GMO modified plant has been bred there [5].
In Switzerland, GMOs are defined as living organisms (plants, animals, bacteria, etc.) whose genetic material has been altered by a non-natural mechanism. According to this definition, crispr/cas9 is a GMOs and consequently prohibited in Switzerland for modified plants. [2].
In my opinion, GMOs are not widely tolerated in Switzerland. Most people do not trust this technique. This is my conclusion, as more and more organic food has been sold in Switzerland in recent years [6]. If the Swiss look at organic food it will probably be very difficult to sell GMO food. As long as the effects of GMOs are not fully understood, the Swiss people will never tolerate them. I think Crispr/cas9 is very interesting and very valuable for science. But I would not eat GMO food. If you can change the genes, you can also manipulate the food to become addicted. Big companies can take advantage of this to make more profit. I trust in science but not in the big companies.
Sources :
[1]
[2] Bundesamt für Landwirtschaft Dezember 2018, GVO in der Landwirtschaft, https://www.blw.admin.ch/blw/de/home/nachhaltige-produktion/gentechnologie.html
[3] Bundesamt für Lebensmittelsicherheit und Veterinärwesen März 2020, Bewilligung von gentechnisch veränderten Organismen (GVO), https://www.blv.admin.ch/blv/de/home/lebensmittel-und-ernaehrung/rechts-und-vollzugsgrundlagen/bewilligung-und-meldung/gentechnisch-veraenderte-organismen-gvo.html
[4] Food Safety - European Commission, GMO legislation, https://ec.europa.eu/food/plant/gmo/legislation_en
[5] Lebensmittel in Deutschland grundsätzlich gentechnikfrei 2020, https://www.bundesregierung.de/breg-de/aktuelles/lebensmittel-in-deutschland-grundsaetzlich-gentechnikfrei-348862
[6] Bio-Konsum wächst in der ganzen Schweiz, April 2018, https://blog.bio-suisse.ch/2018/04/bio-konsum-wachst-in-der-ganzen-schweiz.html
I really liked your last sentence: "I trust in science but not in the big companies.". This is exactly what I thought, but couldn't express in words. Furthermore, you put all relevant aspects into your text, without using much words, that's not easy.
AntwortenLöschena short text which is really easy to understand and we can get a view on your opinion in a few sentences, i like it. Interesting that you would not eat GMO (you mention a opportunity to do addiction-food). I just thought that in most of our present processed food there is a lot of sugar, which can also create an addiction.
AntwortenLöschenYour research turned up some very interesting facts. That food in the EU only needs labeling as GMO when it contains more than 0.9% is a joke I think - who defines what one percent point of change is? Disturbing, but I'm glad that germans haven't bread gene modified plants since 2012. Well written with few words, I like it.
AntwortenLöschenHi Luca
AntwortenLöschenIt is nice to see that you have a good personal opinion. It is based on a informed base, which we have tried to supply you rather than on "religion" (see your first paragraph). I respect your opinion, have also my thoughts sorted on the topic. Information is the most important factor to create when you want to change public opinion. And NGOs like Greenpeace just have one: a big mouth being able to shout out loud, but there is no scientific support behind. The Swiss press can influence this opinion largely, by the way. I made my opinion there in the discussions in 1998 when the GenTech-Moratorium was decided.
I am really curious what you will bring as a group in the elevator pitch!
Greetings
Theo